"A sole proprietorship," and the divorce concession, October 2019

In a Humboldt County child-support case he asked to record, he described Our Nevada Judges in a footnote and conceded what the statute meant for divorce proceedings.

"This organization is not a business entity; it is a sole proprietorship, owned, operated, and controlled by the individual, Alexander M. Falconi."

Reply to Plaintiff's Objection to Media Request, Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County, No. CV 21,682-1, October 29, 2019, signed "Alexander M. Falconi, Our Nevada Judges, Administrator," footnote 1 (NSC No. 80033, Appendix to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed November 18, 2019, pp. 26-27)

"NRS 125.080 was enacted in 1985 and amended once since. If these were divorce proceedings, the statute would control and Our Nevada Judges concedes the proceedings would not be 'open to the public'; it would follow that the presumption of electronic coverage would not apply."

Same reply, p. 2. The same appendix lists the judges he says had allowed coverage by then and cites State v. McDonald, C-18-335284-1, as a covered case.

The objection he drew, and the rulings

"Mr. Falconi is not a news entity, an educational entity, or a news reporter. Mr. Falconi's own website holds Mr. Falconi out as an administrator, not a journalist or media member."

Objection of the obligee's counsel (same appendix, pp. 20-21). A party filing, not a finding.

"No stay was requested, nor could one be, as petitioner is not a party to the action below."

Order Denying Petition, NSC No. 80033, November 19, 2019. Judge Michael R. Montero had denied coverage on other grounds by order of November 14, 2019 (same appendix, pp. 30-37).