Our Nevada Judges, in his own filings

What the founder of Our Nevada Judges swore, signed and conceded about the organization, in the courts where he said it.

The website began as his personal project while he was a litigant before the judge it profiled

he "completed a second, personal project; a website under the domain name www.ournevadajudges.com ... the purpose of the aforementioned website was to assist the voters in the 2014 judicial elections and does not contain my personal opinion," and "I removed the #DV91-256 case from Weller's Profile."
Affidavit of Alexander M. Falconi, notarized July 14, 2014, filed July 17, 2014, Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, No. FV08-03200 (NSC No. 69341, Record on Appeal Vol. 12, filed May 31, 2016, pp. 175-176)

"Right now we have a disproportionate amount of negative articles."
His email of May 2014 from the ournevadajudges.com administrator address, attached to the same affidavit (id. at p. 180)

The presiding judge's finding on his credibility

Mr. Falconi "was highly involved in an opponent's campaign against the undersigned"; "has created a website which contains false information about the undersigned judge's record ... Mr. Falconi refused to correct or remove the false information. Mr. Falconi's refusal to correct or remove false information from his website concerning my record informs my belief of his credibility."
Order of Recusal, Judge Chuck Weller, No. FV08-03200, filed July 8, 2014 (NSC No. 69341, Record on Appeal Vol. 12, p. 158; also NSC No. 65289, Record on Appeal Vol. II, filed August 14, 2014, pp. 221-222)

Note. This is the only judicial credibility finding on him found in the fifteen files reviewed.

"Newly established," "minimal" income, September 2014

"advertisement income received from the newly established www.ournevadajudges.com is minimal and that the website was made not to turn a profit but to aid voters in the 2014 judicial elections and all elections henceforth"
Declaration of Alexander M. Falconi dated September 11, 2014, filed September 23, 2014, NSC No. 64551, pp. 1-4; the PayPal exhibit at p. 39 shows $96.00 for the quarter

"The declaration is untimely and fails to establish that appellant is indigent."
Order Dismissing Appeal, NSC No. 64551, October 7, 2014

A sole proprietorship, and the divorce concession (2019)

His signed reply in Humboldt County, and the objection it drew.

A media entity that refrains from covering divorce cases (2022)

His declaration, the business-license letter, and how the petition ended.