Alexander M. Falconi
This site is not Alexander Falconi's site and is not affiliated with, authorized by, or written by him or by Our Nevada Judges, Inc. It reproduces public court records about him, with citations.

The case for Alexander Falconi, as the record allows

Everything in the fifteen dockets that cuts in his favor, in the courts' own words, with the same citations as the rest of this site. Nothing that helps him is left out; nothing is added. The reader can set it beside the other pages.

What he swore the organization was for

the website "was made not to turn a profit but to aid voters in the 2014 judicial elections and all elections henceforth."

Declaration of Alexander M. Falconi dated September 11, 2014, filed September 23, 2014, NSC No. 64551, pp. 1-4 PDF: No. 64551, pp. 1, 2, 3, 4, 39 PDF: No. 64551, pp. 1, 2, 3, 4, 39

The Supreme Court decision he won, 2024

"we hold that NRS 125.080, EDCR 5.207, and EDCR 5.212 are unconstitutional to the extent they permit closed court proceedings without the exercise of judicial discretion. Accordingly, we grant Falconi's petition and direct the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus"

Falconi v. Eighth Judicial District Court, NSC No. 85195, 140 Nev. 79 (February 15, 2024), slip op. p. 15 PDF: No. 85195, whole filing PDF: No. 85195, whole filing

"Family law proceedings are presumptively open, as they have been traditionally open across the country and the openness of the proceedings plays a significant positive role."

Same opinion, slip op. p. 15
Note. The petition was brought in his own name, doing business as Our Nevada Judges. It is the one unqualified win in the fifteen dockets, and it changed Nevada law on access to family court proceedings.

A court on his motives, 2014

"The Court concludes that FALCONI's stated motives are honorable. The Court also notes that, based on the substance of and the number of pleadings and papers on file, the Court is satisfied that FALCONI will continue to utilize the Court, asking for permission when needed rather than take unilateral action."

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order, No. FV08-03200, December 2014 (NSC No. 69341, Record on Appeal Vol. 12, pp. 239, 245) PDF: No. 69341, pp. 238-246 PDF: No. 69341, pp. 238-246

What the 2013 opinion did not find

"Nothing in the record establishes the specific grounds on which the restraining order was sought or the basis for the grant of the order."

Falconi v. Secretary of State, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 28 (April 25, 2013), slip op. p. 3 PDF: No. 59554, whole filing PDF: No. 59554, whole filing

"Thereafter, [the other parent] apparently did not seek any further extensions of the temporary restraining order. Three months after the restraining order expired, the district court awarded the parties joint legal and physical custody of their child. In doing so, the court did not discuss the temporary restraining order or make any findings regarding domestic violence."

Same opinion, slip op. p. 3

"Falconi's arguments, especially his focus on the fictitious address's interference with his ability to parent, and the facts of this case highlight potential problems that may arise when a parent who shares joint custody" holds a fictitious address; the court set out the procedure a parent in his position may use in the district court.

Same opinion, slip op. pp. 9-10

An adverse order reversed, 2013

"we ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order."

Order of Reversal and Remand, NSC No. 62296, April 12, 2013, p. 2 PDF: No. 62296, whole filing PDF: No. 62296, whole filing
Note. The reversed judgment is the December 2012 order that had called his restraining-order motion "filed in bad faith"; the reversal was on other grounds (the corporation had appeared through a non-lawyer), and the bad-faith finding on this site carries that reversal with it.

The address he was finally given, 2013

"Therefore, Mr. Falconi's Petition is hereby GRANTED. In accordance with NRS 34.160, this Court hereby directs the Secretary of State to disclose" the address.

Order of Judge Weller, December 2013, No. CV13-01019 (NSC No. 65289, Record on Appeal Vol. II, pp. 195-196) PDF: No. 65289, pp. 195-197 PDF: No. 65289, pp. 195-197
Note. Granted because the other parent did not appear; the same order says so, and the March 2014 order that followed says no court found she was not a victim of domestic violence. Both are quoted on the fictitious address page.

That is the whole of it

Six items across fifteen dockets and sixteen years. Everything else the courts wrote about him is under Court findings and Statements against the record, cited the same way.

Documents cited on this page

Declaration of Alexander M. Falconi, September 11, 2014pages 1 to 39 of 39, 175 KBFalconi v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 140 Nev. Adv. Op. 8, February 15, 2024whole filing, 7122 KBFindings, December 2014pages 238 to 246 of 281, 489 KBFalconi v. Secretary of State, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 28, April 25, 2013whole filing, 1079 KBOrder of Reversal and Remand, NSC No. 62296, April 12, 2013whole filing, 28 KBOrder of Judge Weller granting the petition, December 2013, No. CV13-01019pages 195 to 197 of 232, 195 KB

Served copies carry the cited pages, with the minor child's name, the other parent's name, dates of birth and all addresses, phone numbers and email addresses blacked out; nothing else is altered. The complete filings are on the dockets listed under Sources and can be ordered from the Clerk.

Comments

Comments are read before they appear. No account, no address; a name is optional.

Loading comments.

Leave a comment